Annette Island School District

Billed Entity 145693 · Alaska

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$177K$105K$70K$72K$76K$153K$44K$427K$105K$15K$90K$97K$58K$12K$22K$35K$12K$74K
Average discount rate81%75%80%85%85%90%90%90%82%80%80%80%80%80%87%87%85%84%
Schools & libraries (in this area)1111111111
Service providers444555444234224749
Avg download speed (Mbps)
Avg upload speed (Mbps)

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$33K
Telecomm Services$19K$24K$25K$25K$18K$16K$15K$105K$11K$97K$13K$11K$19K$21K$4K$19K
Internal Connections$34K$91K$391K$4K$51K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$102K$86K$45K$47K$52K$43K$29K$21K$15K$79K$45K$1K$3K$10K$8K$4K
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections$9K
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Metlakatla High School$33K$33K$35K$39K$30K$30K$25K$23K$26K$32K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Metlakatla High SchoolMetlakatla85%8686200200Rural

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Alascom, Inc.$2K$1K$43K$46K$51K$43K$29K$21K$91K$15K$79K$2K$3K$6K$5K$4K$3K
Alaska Telephone Company$28K$13K$20K$21K$20K$14K$14K$39K$12K$11K$95K$55K$12K$13K$16K
Redi Electric, Inc.$366K
GCI Communication Corp$145K$86K
Integrated Logic LLC$91K
Dell Marketing LP$4K$31K
ATT Mobility$2K$4K$4K$3K$3K$3K$2K$1K
CDW, Inc.$19K
Hughes Network Systems$2K$8K$8K
GTE Alaska Inc.$17K

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.