Yuma Catholic High School

Billed Entity 16024701 · Arizona

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$5K$9K$9K$9K$11K$13K$11K$8K$15K$11K$13K$16K$15K$15K$12K$1K$3K
Average discount rate50%50%50%50%45%60%50%50%80%60%37%50%50%50%40%40%40%40%40%
Schools & libraries (in this area)1111111111
Service providers1111111211344443335
Avg download speed (Mbps)1,0001,0001,0001,0001,0001,0001,0001,000100200
Avg upload speed (Mbps)1,0001,0001,0001,0001,0001,0001,0001,000100200

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$4K
Telecomm Services$8K$9K$9K$7K$1K
Internal Connections
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$5K$9K$9K$9K$11K$13K$11K$8K$15K$11K$10K$8K$6K$6K$5K$3K
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Yuma Catholic High School$5K$9K$9K$9K$11K$13K$11K$10K$15K$11K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Yuma Catholic High SchoolYuma50%5611221,0001,000Urban

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Charter Communications Operating, LLC$5K$9K$9K$9K$11K$13K$11K$5K
Qwest Communications Corporation$3K$15K$11K$10K$8K$6K$6K$4K
Qwest Corporation$3K$5K$6K$6K$5K$3K
Verizon Wireless (Cellco Partnership)$458$3K$3K$3K$2K
Silverpoint, Inc.$188$750$600$480
AllTel Communications$1K
CDW, Inc.
Yuma Educational Consortium

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.