Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$14K$31K$59K$6K$8K$8K$11K$13K$12K$12K$12K$9K
Average discount rate90%90%87%88%49%60%80%78%90%90%80%80%60%40%
Schools & libraries (in this area)1111111
Service providers11222264444334
Avg download speed (Mbps)50050050050020010075
Avg upload speed (Mbps)50050050050020010075

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$633$2K$5K$8K
Telecomm Services$10K$9K$9K$11K$9K
Internal Connections$16K$44K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$14K$14K$14K$5K$7K$3K$3K$3K$3K$3K$2K
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Paramount Academy$14K$14K$31K$62K$6K$10K$8K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Paramount AcademyPeoria90%389292500500Urban

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Cox Arizona Telcom, LLC$14K$14K$14K$5K$5K$6K$7K$8K$8K$7K
Virtual Graffiti Inc$16K$44K
Verizon Wireless fka Cellco Partnership$51$3K$2K$4K$5K$4K$4K$4K$3K
Electric Lightwave LLC$2K$9K$6K
MCI Communications Corporation
Qwest Corporation fka US West Communications
Enterprise Network Technologies, Inc., dba ENT, Inc.
Trans-West Telephone Co., Inc
Pacific Data Systems
Advanced Network Systems, Inc.

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.