Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$26K$31K$50K$57K$44K$44K$543$1K
Average discount rate87%88%90%88%88%89%87%90%90%80%62%80%80%
Schools & libraries (in this area)1111111
Service providers2322222332223
Avg download speed (Mbps)5,0005,0005,0005,0005,0001,6671,000
Avg upload speed (Mbps)5,0005,0005,0005,0005,0001,6671,000

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice
Telecomm Services$122$1K
Internal Connections$22K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$26K$31K$50K$45K$31K$22K$421
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections
Managed Internal Broadband Services$13K$13K

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Excalibur Charter$26K$26K$31K$50K$61K$49K$58K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Excalibur CharterApache Junction90%3002462,0002,000Urban

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Metropolitan Telecommunications Holding Company$26K$31K$50K$45K$31K$22K
Fruth Group$13K$13K$22K
Qwest Corporation fka US West Communications, Inc.$122$1K
Qwest Communications Corporation$421
AT&T Corp.
MCI Communications Corporation
Darcomm Network Solutions
Cox Arizona Telcom, LLC
Granite Telecommunications, LLC
The Collective TECH, LLC

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.