Black Mesa Community School

Billed Entity 98814 · Arizona

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$580$700$1K$5K$9K$227K$64K
Average discount rate90%88%85%85%10%30%50%75%90%90%90%90%90%90%90%
Schools & libraries (in this area)11111111
Service providers121132245442412
Avg download speed (Mbps)50
Avg upload speed (Mbps)200

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$580$700$1K$4K
Telecomm Services$9K$7K
Internal Connections$212K$64K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$891
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections$7K
Managed Internal Broadband Services
Wireless School Bus Services and Equipment

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Black Mesa Community School$18K$217K$138K$481K$192K$180K$183K$248K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Black Mesa Community SchoolPinon85%6363100200Rural

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
CamNet, Inc.$220K
Avaya Inc.$64K
AT&T Mobility$127$987$5K$3K
Smith Bagley, Inc.$342$282$612$1K$2K$2K
FRONTIER COMMUNICATIONS OF AMERICA$111$418$711$2K$2K
Navajo Comm Co Inc, dba Frontier$2K
Hughes Network Systems LLC$891
Computer Assets, Inc.
MCI Communications Corporation
Navajo Communications Company, Inc.

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.