North Co Jt Un Elem Sch Dist

Billed Entity 144288 · California — Central

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$19K$14K$15K$16K$18K$47K$26K$25K$13K$3K$4K$4K$3K$3K$3K$4K
Average discount rate70%70%70%70%70%70%70%70%40%43%60%70%70%70%70%70%70%
Schools & libraries (in this area)1111111111
Service providers32222332423111223
Avg download speed (Mbps)1,0001,0001,0001,0001,0001,0001,000367512
Avg upload speed (Mbps)1,0001,0001,0001,0001,0001,0001,000367512

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$269$771$2K
Telecomm Services$2K$4K$3K$3K$3K
Internal Connections$15K$23K$1K$4K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$4K$14K$15K$16K$18K$24K$25K$25K$13K$3K
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Spring Grove Elementary School$23K$7K$8K$9K$12K$43K$28K$58K$57K$34K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Spring Grove Elementary SchoolHollister70%756285100,000100,000Rural

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Pacific Bell Telephone Company$4K$6K$6K$6K$7K$13K$14K$14K$3K$3K$4K$4K$3K$3K$3K
San Benito County Office of Education$8K$8K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K$11K
AAA Network Solutions, Inc.$23K
AMS.NET, Inc.$15K
CHI Computers + Solutions, LLC$4K
CCT Technologies, Inc.$1K
AT&T Corp.$12$104
SBC Internet Services, Inc.
Verizon California, Inc.
CompUSA Inc.

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.