St Bede Elementary School

Billed Entity 108790 · California — Northern

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$19K$20K$20K$655$1K$1K$1K$919$522
Average discount rate40%40%40%40%40%40%40%30%50%40%40%40%60%50%50%20%20%40%20%20%
Schools & libraries (in this area)111111
Service providers11121112222222244235
Avg download speed (Mbps)1,00035025025025025050
Avg upload speed (Mbps)1,00035010010010025010

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$655
Telecomm Services$1K$1K$1K$919$522
Internal Connections
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$19K$20K$20K
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
St Bede Elementary School$4K$5K$19K$22K$20K$856

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
St Bede Elementary SchoolHayward50%205501,0001,000Urban

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Windstream Communications, LLC$19K$20K$20K
Pacific Bell Telephone Company$655$1K$1K$1K$919$522
AT&T Enterprises, LLC
Comcast Business Communications
Apple Computer, Inc.
Gilmore Technolog Services, Inc.
SBC Internet Services, Inc.
Education Technology, Inc.
PNG Telecommunications, Inc.
EarthLink Network, Inc.

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.