Sinai Akiba Academy

Billed Entity 100564 · California — Southern

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$2K$2K$840$2K$812$23K$28K$12K$14K$14K$20K$24K$27K$21K$7K
Average discount rate40%40%20%40%20%40%40%40%40%40%27%40%40%40%20%20%
Schools & libraries (in this area)1111111111
Service providers1111122111234442
Avg download speed (Mbps)1,0001,000500500500500500150150150
Avg upload speed (Mbps)1,0001,000500500500500500150150150

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$5K
Telecomm Services$23K$26K$3K$2K
Internal Connections$11K$17K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$2K$2K$840$2K$812$12K$12K$12K$14K$14K$14K$1K$1K$17K$5K
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Sinai Akiba Academy$2K$2K$1K$2K$1K$24K$34K$15K$14K$14K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Sinai Akiba AcademyLos Angeles20%52312,0002,000Urban

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
U.S. TelePacific Corp$12K$12K$12K$14K$14K$19K$22K$25K$15K$6K
CDW Government LLC$11K$17K
Charter Communications Operating, LLC$2K$2K$840$2K$812
Verizon California Inc.$538$1K$1K$1K
Active Internet Technologies, LLC$4K
WhippleHill Communications, Inc.$1K$1K
Verizon Wireless$522$938
BMD Solutions, L.L.C.
ALLTEL Communications, Inc.
Time Warner Cable Information Services (California), LLC

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.