Imagine Schools At Riverside County

Billed Entity 16075953 · California — Southern

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$117K$22K$12K$38K$17K$71K$38K$15K$23K$51K$17K$16K
Average discount rate88%88%90%87%90%87%87%30%54%68%75%90%
Schools & libraries (in this area)1111111111
Service providers231213233535
Avg download speed (Mbps)1,0001,0001,0001,0001,0001,2441,2441,24420050
Avg upload speed (Mbps)1,0001,0001,0001,0001,0001,2441,2441,2446050

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$943$2K$3K$4K
Telecomm Services$9K
Internal Connections$110K$14K$20K$46K$22K$34K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$7K$8K$12K$17K$17K$25K$17K$14K$21K$14K$13K$6K
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections
Managed Internal Broadband Services

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Imagine Schools At Riverside County$119K$23K$13K$44K$17K$71K$38K$18K$28K$51K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Imagine Schools At Riverside CountyCoachella90%8416381,0001,000Urban

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Charter Communications Operating, LLC$7K$8K$12K$17K$17K$25K$17K$14K
Smith Bagley, Inc.$110K
GIGAKOM$20K$28K
U.S. TelePacific Corp$15K$14K$13K
SHI International Corpo.$18K$22K
Desert Communications, Inc.$34K
Jive Communications, Inc.$673$8K$2K$3K$5K
STEP CG, LLC$14K
TelePacific Communications Co$184$5K
Sprint Spectrum, L.P.$74$316$553$1K$2K

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.