Eckerd Youth Alternatives, Inc.
Overview
| Indicator | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total E-Rate subsidies | $50K | $60K | $34K | $43K | $43K | $43K | $44K | $53K | $65K | $68K | $87K | $138K | $114K | $141K | $157K | $314K | $232K | $324K | $254K | $267K | $181K | $216K | $175K | $117K | $40K | — | — | — |
| Average discount rate | 90% | 90% | 90% | 90% | 57% | 90% | 90% | 40% | 53% | 65% | 78% | 90% | 90% | 90% | 90% | 90% | 90% | 90% | 90% | 90% | 90% | 88% | 90% | 90% | 90% | — | — | — |
| Schools & libraries (in this area) | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Service providers | 4 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 5 | 6 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 7 | 8 | 12 | 19 | 17 | 15 | 11 | 11 | 3 | 12 | 14 | 14 | 7 | — | — | — |
| Avg download speed (Mbps) | 560 | 560 | 388 | 306 | 163 | 139 | 185 | 143 | 114 | 114 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Avg upload speed (Mbps) | 560 | 560 | 388 | 278 | 106 | 139 | 185 | 143 | 114 | 114 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Subsidies by E-Rate service type
| Service type | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Voice | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $4K | $16K | $18K | $38K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Telecomm Services | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $31K | $118K | $106K | $130K | $150K | $308K | $121K | $139K | $84K | $78K | $15K | $52K | $175K | $117K | $40K | — | — | — |
| Internal Connections | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Data Transmission and/or Internet Access | $50K | $60K | $34K | $43K | $43K | $43K | $44K | $49K | $49K | $49K | $18K | $20K | $8K | $11K | $7K | $6K | $111K | $185K | $171K | $190K | $166K | $165K | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Managed Internal Broadband Services | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution
| Recipient | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eckerd Community Alternatives - Peak 10 | — | — | — | — | $18K | $18K | $18K | — | — | — |
| Eckerd Connects E-Nini-Hassee | $5K | $7K | $8K | $15K | $15K | $15K | $15K | $17K | $19K | $21K |
| Eckerd Youth Challenge Program | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $15K | $19K | $21K |
Recipient demographics
| Recipient | City | Discount Rate | Students | NSLP | Down Mbps | Up Mbps | Urban/Rural |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eckerd Community Alternatives - Peak 10 | Tampa | 90% | — | — | 200 | 200 | — |
| Eckerd Connects E-Nini-Hassee | Floral City | 90% | 30 | 30 | 1,000 | 1,000 | Rural |
| Eckerd Youth Challenge Program | Brooksville | 10% | 60 | 60 | 156 | 156 | Rural |
Subsidies by service provider (top 10)
| Service provider | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | 2009 | 2008 | 2007 | 2006 | 2005 | 2004 | 2003 | 2002 | 2001 | 2000 | 1999 | 1998 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AT&T Corporation | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $63K | $63K | $85K | — | $151K | $111K | $185K | $171K | $190K | $166K | $165K | $139K | $99K | $32K | — | — | — |
| Windstream Communications, LLC | — | — | — | $28K | $41K | $42K | $42K | $31K | $32K | $34K | $36K | $7K | $7K | $4K | $6K | $29K | $9K | $8K | $8K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| BellSouth Telecommunications, LLC | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $185 | $1K | $2K | $3K | $4K | $4K | $5K | $92K | $12K | $15K | $25K | $26K | $25K | $10K | $8K | $11K | $8K | $6K | — | — | — |
| Verizon Wireless (Cellco Partnership) | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $1K | $7K | $5K | $18K | $30K | $18K | $21K | $36K | $56K | $24K | $40K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sprint Local Telephone Division | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $19K | $2K | $3K | $6K | $7K | $7K | $7K | $3K | $10K | $15K | $21K | $21K | $20K | $5K | $10K | $7K | $5K | $1K | — | — | — |
| New Horizon Communications Corp. | $33K | $41K | $18K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Wilkes Telephone Membership Corporation | $4K | $4K | $2K | $2K | $2K | $525 | $2K | $2K | $3K | $5K | $6K | $6K | $6K | $4K | — | $4K | $7K | $6K | $6K | $6K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Level 3 Communications, LLC | $5K | $5K | $5K | — | — | — | — | — | $18K | $18K | $18K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| TW Telecom Holdings, Inc. | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | $20K | $8K | $11K | $7K | $6K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Charter Communications Operating, LLC | $8K | $9K | $9K | $13K | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.