Bridges Public Charter School District

Billed Entity 17003457 · District of Columbia

Overview

Indicator2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Total E-Rate subsidies$15K$12K$13K$44K$31K$7K$7K$7K$9K$54K
Average discount rate85%90%88%87%80%80%80%80%60%64%
Schools & libraries (in this area)1111111111
Service providers2122211134
Avg download speed (Mbps)1,5001,0001,0001,000100100100100205367
Avg upload speed (Mbps)1,5001,0001,0001,000100100100100205367

Subsidies by E-Rate service type

Service type2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Voice$4K$7K
Telecomm Services
Internal Connections$33K$23K$39K
Data Transmission and/or Internet Access$15K$12K$12K$12K$7K$7K$7K$7K$5K$8K
Basic Maintenance of Internal Connections
Managed Internal Broadband Services$967

Back of Envelope Estimate of Equal Distribution

Recipient2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
Bridges Public Charter School$20K$12K$13K$44K$31K$7K$7K$7K$16K$59K

Recipient demographics

RecipientCityDiscount RateStudentsNSLPDown MbpsUp MbpsUrban/Rural
Bridges Public Charter SchoolWashington80%3622452,0002,000Urban

Subsidies by service provider (top 10)

Service provider2025202420232022202120202019201820172016201520142013201220112010200920082007200620052004200320022001200019991998
Dynamic Network Solutions, Inc.$967$33K$23K$39K
Comcast Business Communications$11K$12K$12K$12K$7K$7K$7K$7K$5K$7K
Jive Communications, Inc.$4K$7K
Starpower Communications, LLC$5K
Verizon Washington, DC Inc.$1K
Quarterhorse Technology Inc

Overview and provider figures are the entity’s total authorized disbursements (entity-wide, FCC Form 471 FRN Status). Per-recipient figures are a back-of-envelope estimate: each funding request line item’s post-discount cost divided equally among the line’s recipients. FY2010–2015 figures are from USAC legacy data (BEN level). FY2026 omitted (funding year in progress). Note: the last year or two in any disbursement series always looks artificially low (FY2025 invoices are still being paid), which is why figures dip at the end — that’s the real state of USAC’s data, not an error. Source: USAC Open Data, retrieved 2026-06-10.